interface fictions

project home
project news

project users

elke van campenhoutDavid Zagarialessandracoppola

project tools

login / subscribe

page tools

share / save this page
get permalink

a.pt menu


a.pt home
a.pt menu
a.pt news
a.pt projects
a.pt participants

a.pt partners

a.passa.s

interface fictions

introductory notes for the participants of the workshop of one week in zsenne performance gallery in brussels:

Dear participants,

The workshop interface Fictions will start next week and we’d like you to prepare for that occasion.
The frame of the workshop is a “personal time score schedule” that each of us will perform each day the same way. These scores will intertwine and  gather our individual space-times in one space, revealing the sameness and difference, but also revealing the problematic character of co-habitation, collaboration, the private and the public.

we would like you to design your day with clear tasks associated to the practice you want to do per time block and obviously taking into consideration all kinds of needs you find essential in a day. you should be able to fulfill these tasks during the whole week, within the same score. (for example: include time blocks for eating, making your toilette, have some leisure, talk a walk, do your shopping, work (possibly divided up in writing, staring at your computer, physical practice, communicative practice, ...), working alone or together, ... you can include your private time, sleeping time, etc... into your score (which would then become an around the clock exercise), or make a clear division between ‘in’-time and ‘out’-time.

for example:    I come in at 10:00 each morning.
        I practice yoga from 10:15 till 11:15
        I talk with others about my project from 11:17 till 11:30
        I work on ...from 11:31 till 13:30
        I go outside for 2 hours
        ...
        you decide yourself on the length of your working day.

you can make up days of 24 hours, or days of 8 hours, or... you can make days that start at night, or days that go backwards, but the important thing to remember is that a day contains every day the same elements, and that keeping to your time score is crucial in the experiment we set up.

your score must adequate express your idea of what it is to live/work in a half-public art space, of how you define your practice within: as private or public, collaborative or individual, hard-working or explicitly idling, utopic or practical, physical or spiritual,.. and to translate these ideas and your score in your appropriation of the common space. take into account the fact that the gallery we work in has windows on all sides and is constantly visible, so you might work this public/private character into your working set-up, and open your space up to the public, or devise your working scheme to include invitations to others (outsiders?) to join into the process.

you can make your score as tight as you wish. depending on the degree of exigence you want to attain. Turn your score into a fiction of daily life, an interface fiction communicating with the outside world, a working site for rethinking being together on an individual base. be an artist, a social worker, an individual lost in space, just yourself (whatever that may be), but be precise.

important note: every day between 14:00 and 15:30 we have a communal moment to discuss what is going on and to talk. make this moment a recurring time zone in your score!

we start on monday at 10 with a discussion and set up. we’ll decide together when to start the score practice.
the address is ZSenne, Anneessensstraat 2, 1000 Brussel. www.zsenne.be

       
If you have any questions don’t hesitate to contact us. Elke or Lilia  (liliamestre@gmail.com)   

See you then!



diary from a window

interface fictions -- alessandracoppola -- Sun 12 Dec 2010 -- 0 reactions

For “Interface Fiction” I wanted to be an explicit object of gazes to experiment the condition itself and to excercise and eventually ehnance the awareness of my own gaze.


I was looking for a device that could put me in a condition of maximum exposure (body, mind, emotions...) that heppens through the eyes.

The intention being to bring the gaze interaction to its extreme consequences. 


I decided to put myself behind the window and spend there 2 hours a day.


-how do my whole body feels being looked?

-how do I look at people?

-what do my look communicate?

-does the people’s gaze respond more to my way of looking or to the device I’m in? 



-Day 1-


The task of the day: to focus on the outside of the window and on the front of my body.


At the beginning I though that the image of a woman, sitting on a pedestal behind a window, would recall inevitably the one of the prostitute, so I assumed this possibility completely and decide to eventually bring the gaze interaction to its extreme consequences also in this case.


I look at the people passing by, I wonder what do you think I am? 

I’m not playing sexy, seductive, but my eyes are very active and awake, 

I feel the exposure of my whole being, when someone comes closer, the body sensation becomes more and more intense and I feel the power of what I can communicate with my eyes and my expressions.

It’s time to negotiate what’s going to happen next...

... I concentrate all my energy on one thought:

I’m here, looking at you. (nothing more, nothing less).

 

It seems that some people are desoriented by the set . They pass by with no expectation from this window .... most of them live or work in the area... No one comes too close, but from a distance they look at the contest trying to figure out what’s going on there.

I don’t know what they think I am, but anyhow they pass by while I’m staying there, i belong to the window: I’m an object.



- Day 2-


Task of the day: focus on the inside of the space and on the back of my body.


Behind me it’s a laboratory, an art space, a place of practice...

Each person define a mobile space by his/her presence, energy and sounds.


-Manne- 

I recognize a space defined by movement that i could compare to the ones of a fly: this person moves aimless, comes close, stays a little while and goes, I don’t feel or hear him anymore, but then again his presence catch my attention, he’s on the other side now, moves around, he makes me curious to guess his actions. 

I can feel a certain aimless consistency in what he’s doing.


-Lilia-

She describes a space with movements that I can compare to the ones of a spider that build up it’s net, does something in it, then it build down, moves somewhere else with a clear direction and build another space:

she’s somewhere, she adds stuff around herself, she builds something, she brakes it down.


-Elke-

She move within a world. It seems like as she changes her placement, she brings with her a whole life.


-Michiel-

He’s like a dot that appears and then you forget about, he’s not there anymore... ah no, here he is! a dot in another point. By the time you identify his position he disappears, his sounds are not there anymore, his presence become vague. And so on... 



 

-Day 3-


task of the day: I’m on the pedestal, focus on my phisical base and play with turning my head and body to look from inside to outside and viceversa.


The outside world become less important, the sense of the space behind is very present.

When I turn to look behind me, I feel part of something and when I turn back to the window  I bring this world with me to the front.

The look of the people passing by effect me less than the previous days, in my perception, the outside became the fiction.  





Epicurean Heterotopia report

interface fictions -- David Zagari -- Thu 11 Nov 2010 -- 0 reactions

 

Diary Interface Fiction

Epicurean Heterotopia

 

 

1st day

11am: setting up.

 

2nd day

4am: 1st painting, yellow.

Overestimation of the time needed to paint the whole room.

1.30pm: We placed a bowl in front of the board and broke 12 eggs in it and left the shells. We expected that the eggs would free their smell progressively until the next day but we surestimate the strenght of the molecules to persist in the room and the gallery or even liberate an odour to be perceived. The odour  would have been a bitter smell, the choice of this element was to reinforce the colour of the room but to give at the same time a second layer, a new information ,in the relation with the space by smelling a reek.

 

3rd day

4 am: 2nd painting, blue.

The practice as religion. The action is framed on time and space and give a structure that we follow without letting us taken by the routine. Even if we are repeating the same procedure the fact that each action is counted in time allow us to practice the score observing the differences from the day before and let us live the present time. The freezing as mirror gives back the past action, the present time and as a minute is long for the brain to keep focused on one thought, it then make us look to the future, to the next action.

The surprise: As Gabriel took the board off the room to start painting he discovered Manne crouched behind the board with crazy eyes,a wig and a knife in his hand. The joke made us briefly laugh but we didn’t let it interfere as we were really focused and sensitive to the incorporation of the score.

1.30pm: As the first element didn’t smell and was, because of this lack of odour, just decorative we react in opposition by substituting the eggs by a scented non visible element, a perfume that we could characterized as a perverse smell. We choose “Serge Noire” from Serge Lutens and did the profile of this perfume. Strong notes of camphre, pepper, incense, it leaves a smoked impression. The image of someone that wears suits, smoke cigars and have a certain financial position, or try to appear as. This perfume was making a contrepoint to the reconforting feeling that the colour was giving to the eyes, by suggesting a “script” through the smell.

 

4th day

4am: 3rd painting, green.

Challenging ourselves by detailing the action more precisely, trying to stick to the score and being more attentive to the frame of the camera that capture and document the practice. By wondering of being exactly in time we were somehow confronted… The movements start to be integrated in mind and body but, still, not yet timewise. As we depend on the strenght of the color that cover the layer that has been done the day before we can not let oursleves flow by only “listening” to our “natural” rythm. The rolls are loosing their quality as we are using it everyday. The tools used for the painting disturb the continuity of the action. The tireness doesn’t help too although the timeframe that we define, 90minutes, give us us the strenght to carry on in a good dynamic as we know and feel that the action has a precise lenght. We go then over exhaustion and do the action meticulously, influenced by the fact that the score push us to live in the present time the action.

The surprise: Manne prepared a breakfast table for us. That create a really nice and relaxed atmosphere.

1.30pm: The element of the previous day has been noticed in the following hours after we put it. But it didn’t last in the manner we expected it. Molecules are volatile and need to be reactivated by breath of air to be able to smell them. As i was cleaning the floor after the morning practice i could smell the perfume and awaked it by scrubbing. The material lightness of the perfume influence its life span by depositing its scent after being blown. Rather than suggesting a script through the perfume, forcing the inhabitants of the gallery or the passers by to embodied a certain posture to awake their sagacity, we decided to project out the room its content by placing a small fan under the board facing the entrance of the room.

 

5th day

4am: 4th painting, brown.

Timewise to score is totally incorporated. We didn’t need to stick to the clock after each action although the tireness can be perceived in the in and out the frame of the camera. We could observe tensions toward each other and with people out of our score time. It’s getting harder to be able to follow our daytime tasks. The choice of activating a space inside the gallery in hours that are not expected push us away from the regulated social time. We had until now defined specific actions for each of us: at 4.14am Gabriel tiny jump, at 4.17am David start painting the sidewall after Gabriel started painting the ceiling, and some more general tasks: finishing the corners+2nd layer. The score at some point seems to be done for one personn, that allow us to change from one day to the other (Gabriel did the finishing one day and the 2nd layer the next one) but not for one personn as 1 individual but as a symbiotic relation between the two. We realized that the score is expending by itself, setting up our way back and our entrance. It is ponctuating us before and after the score.

The surprise: Manne hid a recording of his voice wishing us a good practice and played 2 Lady Gaga’s songs. That influenced our painting, hard to admit, but it seems that we enjoyed it and it gave us a lot of energy, we had to slow the rythm as we were going to finish 10 minutes before we were supposed to.

1.30pm: The brightness of the green was calling the eyes but nobody was going inside the room, we had practically no visitors since we all started.Therefore we wanted to create a path that would appeal to the people to come inside the gallery. As the fan was projecting the room by spreading its particules out of it we inverted the force . We used chocolate candy that we spread from outside the main door of the gallery to the inside of the room.

 

6th day

4am: 5th painting, white.

The surpise: we were totally unestablished and lost timewise the tasks during the painting. We first get affected by the fact that Elke was missing in her bed, then after switching on the light we discovered that Manne painted the room and the board in white with two layers but left the finishing for us to do. We got lost in time and were10 minutes in late, but, weirdly, we managed to freeze on time and finished the practice as defined in the score.

1.30pm: We placed 2 protection masks (the kind that workers use to protect from dust) in the holes of the board in the manner that it would force people to fit there face inside. In the masks we applied our sweat that we collected through the practice. In that way we could display our labor through the week.

Here the video documentation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9C4E5uSC6g



Zagari David


friday, 29 october 2010

interface fictions -- elke van campenhout -- Fri 29 Oct 2010 -- 0 reactions
FRIDAY, 13h24

Things start going wrong today. Michiel doesn’t arrive then after our first interaction, so i’m a bit stuck in space. Adva has preparation stress for the Dominokingdom next day in nadine, so she arrives later for the breakfast. Lilia becomes her stand-in for the first part of the breakfast score. We pick up the conversation I had with Adva the day before, and use the time to discuss the potential of this workshop formula to use in different contexts. We also precise the need for modifications to the scores: they have to be communicative to the outside and the others, so that their affective potential is released. Maybe we should ban computers out of the scores, since a bunch of people sitting around a table working is not really stretching out the concept to its fullest power. We also try to come up with different ways to understand the scoring: not only based on time, but on musicality, on the spatial constructions, on the affective landscape, etc...  Repetition in this environment becomes a very complex given, residing on the different possible parameters to follow. Right now every one is kind of struggling throughout this enormous amount of choices to make at every single moment of performing the score. Also on a documentation level this poses a lot of questions, since everyone always only carries one perspective on what is happening. So the question arises how to think of a fragmented but communal form of archiving. We try to bring it into our communal talks, but what prevails is the question of (self-induced) power: the scores are quite stringent and demanding, and some participants need to blame an outside force for the power exercised over every single moment of their day. on the other hand everybody knows this power is self-induced and can thus not be turned into a refusal towards the exterior. You can only fight yourself here. But if you fail, you also deny the other ones the completion of their stories. It is at moments quite stressful to realize your interwovenness with the ‘bigger group’, the fact that not doing something in these kinds of circumstances is a clear statement of absence to the other’s, since they perceive this as a clear gap in their work.


elke


interface fictions - photos

interface fictions -- elke van campenhout -- Fri 29 Oct 2010 -- 0 reactions
i made a public photo gallery with the pictures of interface fictions. you can easily add yours just by email. please do so! i know you have much nicer ones then mine.
gallery

elke


elke


diary thursday 28 october

interface fictions -- elke van campenhout -- Thu 28 Oct 2010 -- 0 reactions
THURSDAY, 13h28

In the gallery, the atmosphere is slowly shifting during the days to a discussion platform. Little constellations find their way into the scores. My sessions with adva and emiel, michiel’s with varinia and anette, people passing by participating, listening to the other’s conversation while involved in their own practices. This morning we talk about the equilibrium between the stringency of a framed proposal like the time scores, and the freedom it offers for interpretation and interpersonal exchange. Ideally the scores could just work like a transforming social body; relying on the interpersonal transformations more than on an exact time frame, the social body could start speeding up and slowing down at will. Keeping to the score but not to the temporal limitations.
What is the relation between this as a set-up for a workshop and an ‘environmental’ curatorial practice, only offering a formal framework for a freely evolving artistic practice? As a test case it proves its strengths and weaknesses immediately. The experiment only exists in the very strict respecting of the minimal rules for the whole thing to happen at all. Without that there is no social body appearing, and the image of the whole set-up doesn’t become visible to the outside world either.


elke


diary wednesday 27 october

interface fictions -- elke van campenhout -- Wed 27 Oct 2010 -- 0 reactions
WEDNESDAY, 13h25

The constellation has changed today. I did my Nigella practice in front of the window and more people seem to have noticed. It’s Wednesday and the streets are more busy, school children boisterous and challenging the set-up. In the gallery space this time Doris, Manne and Future Husband, who lingers as he did yesterday. Michiel not here, which changes the whole atmosphere for some reason. My position being somehow always related to Michiel’s position in space. This morning with Adva we talked about curatorial practices, and how an open framework for artists to enter into, and to react to each other’s work (as it is in Dominokingdom), also engenders a form of ‘active’ archiving: of picking up where the other has left, transforming it all the time towards future interpretations. I like that idea, but considered that maybe the curator then becomes the active archiver of the discourse that ‘appears’ in these practices as not being completely random, or sense-less. Him being the one that, looking back, lays bare possible points of collision and relates them back to the context in which the framework was produced (institutional, city orientation, whom did the invitations reach, how do the interpretations relate to the social fabric of the city/the scene, etcetera...).
With Future Husband we decided to transform the Flemish Lion into a fierce Puss-in-Boots with killer boots. Also, as a rehearsal for our marriage we decided to go together to the Manifesta exhibition in Murcia, taking a short stop to visit some of his friends in Madrid.
David arrives, the freeze this time not noticed by anyone. They stand in front of the gallery until the window has opened completely, opening up the space for the rest of the day.


elke


diary tuesday 26 october

interface fictions -- elke van campenhout -- Wed 27 Oct 2010 -- 0 reactions
TUESDAY 13u23

The gallery is almost empty. Doris is sitting at the table, eating and staring at her computer. I don’t know what she is working on. My future husband is still here working on our heraldic sign: a flemish lion in high heels against the background of a lys de france. We discuss adding a musical symbol, but cannot agree on which one: I find a bongo too exotic, and a piece of music too cliché. we do agree on putting in a book with as its title laus stultitiarum. I haven’t included enough time in my score to look up all the right images to then translate into embroidery. There are too many things coming up and not enough time in a day to realize them all. It is very quiet here now, with most of the others working outside. David arrives, which means we will finally be able to open the front door. Every day from now on at 13u34. They freeze midway the little place in front of the gallery on their way to the door. The workman behind them seems intrigued by what’s going on. It is the same man that already stared at Lilia’s and my unisono yoga session. It feels like the window sessions are working. Cooking in the window I’m thinking of putting Nigella to shame. People react bemused. Only a few minutes to go before my rearranging task. I guess I will just move my whole corner to the other window. Or not. Maybe just clean up the trail I left behind all morning.


elke
more news items